Declining Fertility Isn’t A Crisis But A Reality

UN economist Michael Herrmann argues that declining fertility isn't a crisis but a reality requiring "demographic resilience" and better social support for families

Globally, most people say they want two or more children, but many end up having only one or none at all today. Despite these trends, a senior UN economist argues that the widespread fears of a looming demographic timebomb are actually quite unwarranted for most. The latest State of World Population report from the UN sexual and reproductive rights agency (UNFPA) shows that around one in five adults worldwide believe they will not be able to have the number of children they want, largely because of economic insecurity, inequality and lack of support.

Michael Herrmann, a demographer with the UNFPA, suggests that declining fertility is simply a new reality that societies must learn to plan for carefully. Consequently, instead of panicking over shrinking numbers, governments should focus on building “demographic resilience” to adapt their institutions to these inevitable changes.

What is Demographic Resilience?

Mr. Herrmann is advocating for a concept called demographic resilience, which helps societies anticipate population changes and make better use of human potential. This approach applies to both developing and wealthy nations, regardless of whether their populations are currently growing, shrinking, or rapidly ageing. Some countries benefit from a “demographic dividend” with a young workforce, while others can find success through a “second dividend” by investing in technology. Therefore, raising productivity through education and skills can help offset the economic challenges that often come with an older, smaller workforce.

Why “Cash for Kids” Schemes Often Fail

As birth rates fall, some governments react by offering cash bonuses, tax breaks, or even official fertility targets to encourage larger families. However, the evidence suggests these measures have a limited impact because one-off payments do not change long-term life decisions for most parents. Michael Herrmann notes that these checks might influence when people have children, but they rarely influence whether someone decides to become a parent. Instead of simple financial incentives, experts suggest addressing the deep-seated economic and social pressures that prevent people from reaching their desired family size.

The Real Barriers to Growing Families

Early results from a 70-country survey show that high housing costs and insecure employment are the primary reasons why people have fewer children. Furthermore, many young adults worry about the future, citing concerns about political instability and the long-term effects of climate change on the planet. Unequal gender roles also weigh heavily on these decisions, as women often bear the majority of unpaid care and domestic work burdens. These complex issues cannot be solved with a simple check; they require systemic changes in how societies support and value growing families.

Protecting Reproductive Rights and Choice

Policies driven by the fear of population decline can sometimes undermine human rights, particularly the rights of women to choose their own paths. Top-down fertility directives often lead to harmful assumptions, such as restricting access to reproductive healthcare or curtailing vital sex education for the youth. A rights-based approach starts by asking what prevents people from having the children they want and then providing practical, non-coercive solutions for them. These solutions include affordable housing, accessible childcare, and paid parental leave for both parents to ensure a more balanced and stable domestic life.

Addressing the Shrinking Labour Force

The most significant challenge of a demographic shift is a shrinking labour force, which requires a focus on inclusion rather than panic. Herrmann suggests that societies must bring more women, migrants, and young people into the workforce to maintain economic momentum. Additionally, governments must prioritize investments in education, technology, and infrastructure to raise overall productivity. By doing so, a smaller workforce can achieve the same, or even higher, economic output as a larger one.

Migration: A Complex Demographic Tool

Migration remains a powerful and frequently misunderstood force in global demographics, particularly for nations facing steep population declines. In many regions, such as the Western Balkans, low birth rates are only half of the story behind the shrinking numbers. High emigration levels have seen populations fall by 20 to 30 per cent as young people leave to find better work elsewhere. In contrast, countries like Germany have successfully avoided decline by encouraging inward migration from other regions.

Why Migration is Not a “Quick Fix”

While immigration helps balance numbers, it is not a “quick fix” for a dying workforce without proper social support systems. Migrants often face exclusion from the labour market if they lack access to language training or if their qualifications go unrecognized. This systemic failure harms both the newcomers and the host societies that desperately need their skills and energy. Consequently, successful demographic resilience requires pathways that truly integrate new arrivals into the national economy.

Analysis: Shifting from Growth to Productivity

The current demographic shift is not a crisis that needs fixing, but a transition that requires a fundamental change in economic thinking. By focusing on a “second dividend,” nations can maintain high standards of living even with a shrinking workforce by prioritizing education and technology. This strategy moves away from the “blunt instrument” of simply raising retirement ages and instead offers flexible working options for the elderly. Ultimately, supporting the rights of individuals to choose their family size creates a more resilient and satisfied society for future generations.

Q&A: Understanding the Demographic Shift

Q: Why are fertility rates declining globally?

A: Economic insecurity, high housing costs, and a lack of childcare support are making it difficult for people to have the children they want.

Q: Does a shrinking workforce mean economic collapse?

A: Not necessarily; societies can adapt by investing in productivity-boosting technology and creating more flexible roles for older adults who wish to continue working.

Q: Can government bonuses fix low birth rates?

A: Most research indicates that one-off payments have only short-lived effects and do not fundamentally change long-term reproductive choices or national fertility trends.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the UNFPA?

The UNFPA is the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency, which tracks population trends and advocates for the rights of women and youth.

What are the main reasons people skip having children?

The most common factors include expensive housing, insecure jobs, climate change anxiety, and the unequal distribution of unpaid domestic work between genders.

What is a “demographic dividend”?

It is the economic growth potential that results from shifts in a population’s age structure, specifically when the working-age population is large.

How does demographic resilience help a country?

It allows a society to adapt its institutions and infrastructure to a changing population size without sacrificing individual rights or economic stability.

Home » Declining Fertility Isn’t A Crisis But A Reality

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *